Content workshop / Archive pilot / May 2025
One story.
Five ways in.
Same reporting, a different reason to stop scrolling. These are review samples from the Hype Check source package, ready to inspect and download.
Historical source: GitHub’s coding agent announcement, May 19, 2025; updated May 23. Product behavior may have changed since this edition.
X / The sharp observation
A new teammate. Still a review queue.
Copilot's May 2025 launch put issues on the path to a draft PR. Human review stayed in the loop.
Lead with the useful distinction. The image earns attention; the source link earns trust.
Download X PNG ↓LinkedIn / The practical consequence
Measure the handoff.
A useful team experiment: delegate one small issue, review the result, and measure the whole process. Count review time too.
A proposed experiment, not a claim that we ran it. Invite practitioners to compare their own experience.
Download LinkedIn PNG ↓Instagram / The visual reveal
Three slides. One reality check.
The pitch. The process. The part still unproven. Swipe through the receipts.
A three-frame editorial carousel. Each frame advances the argument; the caption gives the source and archive date.
Download Instagram PNG ↓
Facebook / The conversation
Where would you hand it over?
A coding agent joins the workflow. Which small task would you hand over first, and what would you check before accepting it?
Pair this discussion prompt with the X evidence card and the dated source. Keep the language accessible, with a concrete invitation to share experience.
TikTok / 20-second storyboard
The handoff test.
- 0–3 seconds: Show an issue card. “Would you delegate this?”
- 3–9 seconds: Animate the path from issue to draft PR. Label it “Launch workflow · May 2025.”
- 9–15 seconds: Stop at review. “What would you check?” Show a three-item checklist: tests, scope, edge cases.
- 15–20 seconds: End on “Make the call. Check the receipts.” Link to Hype Check.
Storyboard only. A future demonstration needs actual captured results. This sample makes no claim that FT.NEWS ran a product test. Voice and motion treatment are still creative choices.
Editorial rule: a source-backed claim, a useful interpretation, and an open question should look different. Choose destinations deliberately; every story does not need every platform.